Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh at the forefront of growth – the pandemic effect
As the financial year, 2021-22 came to an end, one saw a lot of jousting between ministers of different states, about where the economic growth of India is coming from. Triggers for such one-upmanship may be political; however, it is extremely critical for businesses to understand the geographical distribution of income in the country to as granular a level as possible. Towards this end, we decided to examine the budgets and economic surveys of various state governments to understand which areas are growing rapidly.
India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is estimated at ₹230 trillion for 2021-22, at current prices. This is a growth of about 18% over the previous year, which was dramatically affected by the pandemic. It represents a compounded growth of 7% over 2019-20 (2 years).
In this essay, state-level data is reviewed to look at the geographical spread of growth. In a subsequent write-up, data from key cities and districts will be dwelt on to understand growth dynamics. Most states have already published GSDP estimates for 2021-22. For a few states, where GSDP data is missing, their last GSDP estimate has been multiplied by the national average growth to arrive at the estimated GSDP. Fortunately, these estimates are very few.
Impact of pandemic at state-level
As with any country, there is economic concentration in a few states:
5 states comprise about half the economy – Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Gujarat
What is remarkable is the incremental growth is not coming in the same order as the size of the economy with UP and Karnataka delivering 2-year Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) in excess of 12%. These rates are significantly higher than the India growth. Maharashtra, in this 2-year period, lags the India growth rate, slightly.
Such sharp re-location of growth in a 2-year period, has huge implications for businesses, whether their order management is driven from physical stores or from virtual ones. One can venture to suggest two possible hypotheses for the re-location of growth, driven primarily by the pandemic:
● Massively services driven economy like Karnataka (66%), has been able to take advantage of the Work-From-Home (WFH) environment to grow at similar pace as past years.
● A state like Uttar Pradesh has been able to utilise workers who migrated back, in productive work, especially in infrastructure build-out.
While absolute growth is important, one cannot lose sight of the fact that all these states have very different population.So, one needs to look at GDP Per Capita (Gross National Income or GNI), to get a better sense for spending power.India’s GNI stands about ₹1.68 lakhs (about $2.2k).
The famous $4k
Experts in consumer behaviour mention that once the GDP per capita (Gross National Income or GNI) crosses $4,000 (about ₹3 lakh) consumption basket changes significantly.One can keep that in mind, while looking at GSDP Per Capita or Gross State Income (GSI).
● 9 states / Union Territories (UTs) have GSI in excess of ₹3 lakhs.
● Of these, the largest economy is Karnataka, followed by Gujarat and then, Delhi.
Here is a look at the large 5 states comprising about half of Indian economy:
GSI (₹ lakhs)
2 year growth (₹ trillion)
2 year CAGR (%)
2021-22 GSDP (₹ trillion)
Economic growth coupled with more disposable income (as seen in GSI) is clearly seen in Karnataka, closely followed by Gujarat. Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra have very close GSI, with the slower growth in the last 2 years hampering GSI in Maharashtra. While the absolute incremental amount of growth in Uttar Pradesh has been the highest in the last 2 years, the vast population of the state keeps the GSI quite low.
● Pandemic has caused significant re-location of growth over the last 2 years. This is clearly seen in the GSDP and GSI data for the last 2 years
● Perhaps, it was an underlying trend going back to earlier years, which was exacerbated by the pandemic-related migrations and economic activity. This will be known over the next few years, as more economic activity confirms and rejects this hypothesis.
● Credit growth data provides some corroboration of the re-location of economic growth. I had commented about this last year. In this light of the GSDP growth and last year’s credit growth, practitioners could start paying serious attention to RBI’s credit and deposit growth data, which is available at good granularity and frequency, for leading indicators of growth in different parts of the country.
● Uttar Pradesh and Karnataka have emerged as drivers of the Indian economy
A Practitioner’s view
Anand Bhatia, CMO of Fino Payments Bank, has a ring-side view of all the changes happening in the country, with their 8+ lakh merchant network. He has not only seen the changes during his visits to the heartland but has been able to take advantage of a massive build-out in the state of Uttar Pradesh. This was done by mapping every single village (across the country) and its desirability for an immediate merchant location, using Aaloka extensively for this purpose. This kind of structured approach to the distribution network has delivered sustainable profitable growth, to the newly listed entity.
In summary, the emergence of Karnataka’s economy with its size and disposable income is quite evident. It is quite poetic, that a Kannada movie, the Yash-starrer KGF2 (with all its dubbed avatars), is setting box-office records in India.
In the next part of this blog, we will examine data at a more granular level – district and city level, by considering some of the states discussed in this essay.